Is 98% accuracy good enough? An AI traffic surveillance and anomaly detection system has achieved 98% accuracy test results for a Smart City deployment in Texas, via Traffic Technology Today. https://t.co/2q5dCaePR4 https://t.co/5BDDtizBuz

- 3월 19, 2020

Favorite tweet:

Is 98% accuracy good enough? An AI traffic surveillance and anomaly detection system has achieved 98% accuracy test results for a Smart City deployment in Texas, via Traffic Technology Today.https://t.co/2q5dCaePR4 pic.twitter.com/5BDDtizBuz
— TRB (@NASEMTRB) March 18, 2020

Is 98% accuracy good enough? An AI traffic surveillance and anomaly detection system has achieved 98% accuracy test results for a Smart City deployment in Texas, via Traffic Technology Today. https://t.co/2q5dCaePR4 https://t.co/5BDDtizBuz http://twitter.com/NASEMTRB/status/1240359846517583873 https://t.co/2q5dCaePR4 March 19, 2020 at 04:30AM

이 블로그 검색

Scrap

Is 98% accuracy good enough? An AI traffic surveillance and anomaly detection system has achieved 98% accuracy test results for a Smart City deployment in Texas, via Traffic Technology Today. https://t.co/2q5dCaePR4 https://t.co/5BDDtizBuz

댓글

댓글 쓰기

이 블로그의 인기 게시물

The TRB Forum on Preparing for Automated Vehicles and Shared Mobility brings together public, private, & research organizational partners to share perspectives on the critical issues around #AutomatedVehicles and #SharedMobility. Join us May 13! https://t.co/JdVG3j8grn https://t.co/MTJVp7Eng6

네이버 지도 API 길찾기 - 출발지와 도착지 입력

Supervised Clustering: How to Use SHAP Values for Better Cluster Analysis https://t.co/7WKYgRUJou #AI #MachineLearning #DeepLearning #DataScience https://t.co/oTVhwcnJ39